Largest vc firms by aum

As GPs have become gun-shy about today’s higher prices, deal activity has fallen, and dry powder has reached an all-time high—though our research suggests that dry powder is not nearly the problem that some have suggested. In fact, in this and other ways, the industry is overcoming its growing pains and finding new ways to deliver for its investors.

Our research included interviews with executives at some of the world’s largest and most influential asset managers, which revealed several common expectations for 2017. All acknowledge that an extraordinary number of wild cards are now in play, especially in geopolitics. While these unknowns will create opportunity for some, most GPs acknowledge that this sort of uncertainty is very difficult to price.

Largest vc firms by aum

In October 2021, Deutsche Beteiligungs was the financial sponsor for Silbitz Group in a definitive agreement to acquire Eisengiesserei Torgelow, a German manufacturer of cast iron for the onshore and offshore wind power industry, via an LBO.

Quadriga Capital

  • Investments 2020–present: 13
  • Total investments: 91
  • AUM: €1.78B

Around since 1995, Quadriga Capital makes majority investments through buyouts, management buyouts and buy-ins and public-to-private partnerships. The firm primarily invests in commercial services, consumer services and healthcare across DACH. Most recently, Quadriga Capital was the financial sponsor of GBA Group in the acquiring of Labroc, a laboratory services group based in Finland, through a leveraged buyout.

Largest venture capital firms by aum

Capital deployment mirrors and even exceeds the surge in fundraising, up an average of 17 percent per annum since 2015, capped by a 53 percent increase in 2018, when the industry invested $251 billion. Supersize venture rounds in which start-ups attract $1 billion or more from VC firms emerged in 2015. In 2018, 25 supersize rounds represented over 25 percent of all VC deal volume.

Key differences between 2007 and 2018

Another highlight from 2018 was deal value: despite the flat trend in deal count, the value of PE deals reached a new high at $1.4 trillion, finally surpassing the precrisis peak in 2007.
That feat, along with the recent seesaws in public-market valuations, suggests that a look back at 2007, the last high-water mark, may be in order. Whenever the next downturn comes, many in the industry are saying that the industry may be in a better position now (Exhibit 4).

AUM reached an all-time high of $6.3 trillion, driven primarily by asset appreciation within portfolios. With a pooled IRR of 27 percent in 2021, private equity (PE) was once again the highest-performing private markets asset class (Exhibit 2).

‘Risk on’ in real estate. Within real estate, investors rotated to higher risk-return strategies relative to their prepandemic preferences, which perhaps reflects investors anticipating buying opportunities in a stressed or distressed environment. Fundraising in opportunistic and value-add strategies grew sharply (Exhibit 3), while open-end core and core-plus funds experienced net outflows.

Kҍ�x���+|TU�� 3|�v}��5u��i,�VMMQ��T�’�#aqG�Nv �V�SB̄8����Td�^w6�K��*Ͻ�(�q��Q��Ob�G�-�Kpcy4�K���_w�j!� �W ��V6�,�ƞ�!MOG��j”�nIGhRZ��v�������5��j��H�f��i��*s��r��Qfnow]�ӂ�S��/�XK}ϫ��rj/~x���6��R�+WZz홇%���3��K���l}�(79#�a�첧����Z�� �����?N|/@��|%����ü���1_ɫ��zl�b��^�s[����_�1�8�k7$��F�$���(g7�R�Z��¨a7}��”w�”�Q�-� WX*-�B��`8� t��./e�+n)%8Y]���*���℁޶[email protected]!��:Z�r�^���������Ղ R�w�3Lm�=��D�’�+�7�9���U.�&kc�K�Q�9SQq�d?���}(Y�f�A��Z� ����t <ఱS�Bo�h �v�����,���̰����g�E�pbWG��v<�*�f���ؚ�%߄��ז�(�^F���el&������”u����Ax4�t���z��:��֨u��Q’�O��CQb����P�@������ ��� �9/_��}��E��s#x]�N�”�’`.�ն腹”������Kz���A���5W�o񇱃��zwM�E��,stt�]�\c�!�^#�| ӗ�9#5_�qH�=�?�h����N�U7+F�n�,b��ȄWv�ݮm�P�5ޜ�-�l�^0��w��P������[V3���� �(����Z�����b���(���P����^�\��j��8X8��̦�D(�G,�:v�NSi� =PR��]�NR�-��Y�!���⼆��y�3U�l\P�1���� (�����.���fI�����”�P��b^��r-Xs���P��� ,���a��’������ܳ�;6��.i�3�z.
Aum. Where accessible, the following table includes private equity Aum.

List of the Largest Venture Capital Funds

Here some largest Venture Capital funds are following

  • Accel Partners | $3B
  • Matrix Partners | $4B
  • Sequoia Capital | $4B
  • Battery Ventures | $3B
  • Versant Ventures | $3B
  • General Catalyst | $3.2B
  • Iconic Capital | $14.5B
  • Bain Capital Ventures | $4B
  • Institutional Venture Partners | $7B
  • Insight Venture Partners | $18B
  • General Atlantic | $31 Billion
  • Lightspeed Venture Partners | $4B
  • Hillhouse Capital Group | $30 billion
  • Bessemer Venture Partners | $4.5B Greylock Partners | $3.5 Billion
  • Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers | $3B
  • Andreessen Horowitz & Co.

However, ethnic diversity is not yet broad-based, and diversity in general is lacking in the most senior roles, suggesting that firms continue to miss opportunities.

Key lessons emerge as firms accelerate investment in digital and analytics. Leading firms continue to make major investments in digital and analytics capabilities across both front and back office to capture economies of scale as they grow.

DownloadPrivate markets rally to new heights to read the full report on which this article is based (PDF–9.0MB).

Private markets 2021: A year of disruption

Private markets rebounded in 2020 after a turbulent first half, but performance varied by investment type.
Few transactions were completed in the depths of the (brief) slide in the public markets, reminding many in the industry that “waiting for a buying opportunity” may entail a lot more waiting than buying.

  • Fundraising for private equity secondaries flourished in 2020, tripling on the back of strong outperformance in recent years (Exhibit 3). The space remains fairly concentrated among a handful of large firms, with the largest fund sizes now rivaling buyout megafunds. Continued evolution in secondaries may be key to making private markets more accessible to a broader range of investors.
    • The phrase “permanent capital”—like “private equity” itself—means different things to different people.
      To some, it refers to general partners’ (GPs) sale of a stake in the firm, either directly to an investor, or via a fund-of-funds stake, or via IPO.

    Yet paradoxically there is little evidence of any consolidation at the top of the industry. And even as the number of active PE firms continues to grow (it’s now nearly 7,000), more managers are calling it quits than ever. Most of those raised just one fund, suggesting that attrition is mainly a result of one-and-done managers.

    Technology in every sector. Deal volume declined in every region except North America, where the amount of capital invested rose 7 percent to $837 billion, a new high.
    Tech deals, up almost 40 percent, powered this growth. In parallel, the number of tech-focused private market firms has grown rapidly, while many others have tilted in that direction.

    During the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2008, many limited partners (LPs) pulled back from private asset classes and ended up missing out on much of the recovery. This time, most LPs seem to have learned from history, as investor appetite for PE appears relatively undiminished following the turbulence of the last year.

  • All things considered, it was a relatively strong year for PE fundraising. Overall funds raised declined year on year due to an apparent short-term discontinuity in the early months of the pandemic, but the prepandemic pace of fundraising returned by the fourth quarter (Exhibit 2).

    Growth in assets under management (AUM) and investment performance in most asset classes eased off in the spring, as the industry adjusted to new working norms, then came back strong in the latter half of the year.

  • Sn����h��b���S”Įh�7B�xh�i�ܵվ�ۋ��ᣰ�N��a5���Bn^�2��RM’Ś�ct�����7~5�f�P�ii�:F��TQ%�M�H��?�6LH��]�`@fx�9ᖇS�(���[��,ޝ����j�$~l0�1�4�NT!�D+pY��2�4�p]T+���tb+��!�e�!镎�Ŏf53���e���’����tA��GX.�Y�Gʩ�b3�o���!��9psR���]�jý)�d�\�!�/�ם`�Q�� ߩY�waRl�mH�)7���%2�k���4�8ʁNz����shS�Wn簾$%��M#��5�a��`�X�d)��`���M�u��� �”��.U�/��`�)@�� �t�E��ffV7� ��M���!d�x’��%��ş4<4U`-f �o<۰���x�?vO0��ꁥ]��Li�N��F�q��1V �:gV}�?�Ry�e�n��m6�T*��R�bV��O���.Z�%&?Ks0En”�PI�.�Y�SqL��D���iZ*����y!��T�nJ�f���#�Ja�[�5�_���j3~��T��L�X�hd�I\��Dz��(5�/���F�”��wUT/������([email protected]��׭�C�g��B����3$zX�C�\�C�”�U�”}݉� |2�&��ay��VORX9L�K�`��{ji�(���rk1��Ӂ�+������g�q6 R��y���� ���f� �vu�ٰ�?ޚx��r�oԄ���fy�AVʶ��� Zz�8�b2Kq�8�&�=���(�⴨�4��Z�]�ěRP/W���â�]�Xј?_t�,i��Y4ngSX;K�?���o���5�N(��83�@��<�+%�r���Ì�ArO��’Qb���@=�Q�’)k��Zga���c���/�<��”��!`a:����ɰ��Ud��˩T�6z�r”�cUfđ�}�Av�Y��D�C���k�I��_q�x���T���-�$ 8�.

    Most of their recent investments have been provided to early-stage and late-stage companies in the energy, financial, healthcare, and internet industries. The Sequoia Capital Global Growth Fund III that they started in 2018 has since raised upwards of $6 billion.

    New Enterprise Associates

    New Enterprise Associates is a venture capital firm that has offices all throughout the U.S. and has made a total of 1,589 investments.

    Of these investments, 333 were successful exits. When working as the lead investor, their success rate jumps to 57.41 percent.

    Some of their most successful exits include Onshape and Uber.

    Their investments are global and can be made to practically any type of company. However, they focus on the technology and healthcare industries with their investments.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.